hello monday! (150209)

 

feeling like shit tonight, so i cracked open jenny offill's dept. of speculation and a pint of haagen-dasz' cookies and cream, which is damn near impossible to find, mind you.  figured the combination of the two of them could help fend off these convictions of colossal failure because, god, melodramatic is apparently now my default state of being, and tonight's a particularly bad night.

on page 7, it says:

i found a book called thriving not surviving in a box on the street.  i stood there, flipping through it, unwilling to commit.

you think that the mental anguish you are experiencing is a permanent condition, but for the vast majority of people it is only a temporary state.

(but what if i'm special?  what if i'm in the minority?)

i write a lot about suicide, which means i think a lot about suicide, and i think about how being suicidal isn't sometimes a continued, prolonged state.  i think of it as cycles, as ups and downs, except the downs aren't simply downs but a single, profound thought resonating in your brain, your body, your heart -- i want to die -- and you keep coming back to this, maybe not everyday but continually, constantly, always thinking of when and where would be best because, when it comes to dying, you need a plan.  sometimes, it's not about executing the plan but simply about having one in place, a sort of emotional protective net to fall back on because it's comforting, knowing that there's an alternative out there, that there's always that thing you can do when all of this -- whatever this is -- loses every shred of meaning.

(sometimes, i think about faith and how it shouldn't be so easy to reconcile the two.  i think about God and the church and how it's constantly failed the depressive, the mentally ill, the suicidal, and i think there's nothing to reconcile -- we will continue to struggle with this pain, and the church will continue to fail us, and God -- i suppose God will be there for those of us who believe in whatever capacity we choose to believe.)

and i think about how, no, this "mental anguish" has nothing to do with permanence or temporality because there are good days and then there are bad days and it's never a comfort to hear everything will be all right! or you'll be okay! because what the hell does anyone know, please take your goddamn platitudes elsewhere.  and maybe i shouldn't be writing blog posts when i'm feeling like shit (and why did my "hello monday" posts get so personal, anyway), but it also feels good to be able to write about suicide and what i think about suicide without the cloak of fiction, so at least there's that.

i also haven't read much at all over the past week because i find myself unable to commit to a book at the moment.  hopefully, i'll get more into dept. of speculation and finish it over the next few days.  and i received kim thuy's mãn and alex ross' listen to this over the weekend and purchased michael cunningham's the hours, joan didion's the white album, and patricia park's re jane (i might have a problem, this is true), so let's read more this week -- there's such a wealth of worlds and beauty and humanity in these blocks of paper bound between pieces of cardboard (or thicker paper), which helps me derive infinite comfort in the knowledge that i will always have books, that my melodramatic shit has made them even more important in my life, and, for me, that is sufficient.

(also, the cover of the hardback of dept. of speculation is beautiful, so what the fuck happened to the paperback?  had to order this off the internet because i just could not have the hideous paperback cover.)

(if you're reading this post, this blog, thanks for reading.  i really, really mean that.)

hello monday! (150202)

i've been thinking about burdens -- the burdens of authors, of readers, of literature -- because i stumbled across a paper* (or something) written about a topic i admit i don't remember (which makes this a terrible introduction) -- what i remember was a mention of chang-rae lee and how he fails to "give back" to korea/korean-america (based off his debut novel, native speaker; i do remember the paper was written before a gesture life).  i probably should have actually read this paper to ascertain the writer's point more clearly, but it was honestly just that claim that stuck with me because i couldn't help but wonder, but what does it mean?  to "give back" to your ethnic community?  and is that a burden that should fall on authors [of color]?  and in what ways?  to what extent?

i've been thinking about the burden of literature, too, how certain books are given more weight than others, and how that can or might affect how we decide about what we read, like in feeling obligated to pick up certain books.  and how that in and of itself could influence how we read certain books, burdened as we are with all this attached "goodness" and "worthiness" -- and maybe this sounds foolish and of no consequence, but do you ever wonder why you read the things you do?

two friends and i touched on this topic this past weekend over brunch, and it reminded me of what chang-rae lee said at his reading at greenlight a few weeks ago -- that we should interrogate ourselves as readers.  (okay, he was talking in the context of himself as a writer also interrogating himself as a reader, but i think we should all interrogate ourselves as readers.)  a few years ago, i had to make the conscious effort to read outside my comfort zone, to read more diversely, because, for one, i felt like i'd fallen into a rut in my reading life and, for another, why was i reading so much from one group when there is such a richness of reading material available?  and i could still stand to challenge myself further, but it's been a better reading life thus far, i dare say, though now  i'm trying to loop this back to the burden of literature and kind of struggling to do so ...

*  i most likely grossly misrepresented this paper, for which i sincerely apologize.


i come from a world that openly and vocally dismisses the novel as something that has no use or value.  the novel is a mark of immaturity because mature, grown people move on from the novel and read essays and philosophy and non-fiction (or, rather, they read books on faith and how to live a good christian life and such) because essays and philosophy and non-fiction (or theology and religious discourse and christian thinking) have a "tangible" use in "furthering" and "bettering" them and helping them "grow."

to which i say, how small your minds are, when the worlds of novels contain multitudes, the stories we might not want to hear because they pain us or disgust us or shame us, the histories that others have sought to erase, the voices that have been silenced or exploited or manipulated.  when novels wrestle with what it is to be human in all its complications and richness and lay bare for us the spectrum of human longing and suffering and love and the universality of the human condition -- we are not so different from each other as some might have us, might desire us to believe.

and, to those who dismiss the novel and toss christian texts in my lap, i say, well, christ understood the value of stories, too.


was that a lot for a monday post?  it's been a long week, though, and i find myself a bit weary.  the blizzard last week was anticlimactic, tapering off before getting anywhere close to the foot or two or three of snow we were supposed to receive.  there was snow, though, eight inches of it, and i did so revel in it because, like i said, i love snow, and the world is a magical place after snow.

and then it turns to slush.  and/or ice.

one of my closest friends is visiting the city this weekend, and i'm loads excited for it.  we're going to eat and walk and visit all my favorite places, and we're going to talk about books and our stupid, foolish ambitions and the good wife.  she's probably going to freeze because she's from california, and i'm going to laugh because i told her to buy a beanie (she's refusing), and she's probably going to declare her hatred of new york city vehemently over and over again, and i'm going to laugh some more.  all while we eat and walk and eat and walk some more ...

basically, it's going to be a good weekend.  >:3

(and i already broke my resolution to read a book in korean every month ... damn!)

hello monday! (150126)

it's snowing today.  or that's an understatement because this is a blizzard, not a mere snowstorm, and we're looking at record-breaking amounts of snow.  which isn't something i'm wont to believe because storms tend to be blown out of proportion and inspire hyperbolic freakouts, aka people stocking up on water and bread and trader joe's boxed salads like it's the end of the world -- but, then, i went walking around in the snow today, and we got inches within three hours, so, hey, i believe it.  sorta.  well, more than i did before juno arrived and the MTA announced subway shutdowns and NYC schools decided to close tomorrow.

i love snow.  which is also an understatement because i don't just love snow, i love snow.  i've been alternately bummed out and irritated this winter because of the lack of snow (seriously, ask anyone i know; s/he'll tell you how much i've complained about it), so i'm pleased as punch (and aware that there's a privilege to that), though i'm bummed that tomorrow's launch party for vivian apple at the end of the world at housingworks has been cancelled.


reread never let me go (faber and faber, 2005) this weekend and started taking down notes yesterday so i can write about it and the buried giant (post to arrive by the end of the week).  part of me feels like the buried giant is so markedly different from ishiguro's other work, and another part of me simply derives pure joy from talking about never let me go as often as i can, and yet another part of me just enjoys this process, this analyzing of themes and characters and voice, because it hearkens me back to college and comparative literature and how much fun it all was.

i've seriously got to join a book club.


starting reading the woman upstairs (knopf, 2013) over the weekend, and i'd heard and read so much about how nora is unlikable that i wonder if that didn't predispose me to like her.  because i do.  because i can identify with her rage and anger and also with her disappointments and with how her life was supposed to be different -- she was supposed to be an artist; she was supposed to live in this city and live this life and have this kind of happiness; and i'd argue that it doesn't really matter what the specifics are, simply that things were supposed to be different.

at least, these are my initial thoughts because i'm only ninety pages in.  we'll see if i continue to like her -- and how much messud's short chapters bug me.  other authors and their short, clipped sentences bug me, but messud's short, clipped chapters bug me.  it was one thing that drove me a bit mad with the emperor's children (knopf, 2006), how she kept hopping from character to character, chapter to chapter, so much that i wished i could reach into the book and hold it still in one place before it went bouncing on.  i've had mixed reactions to the short chapters in the woman upstairs thus far, so we shall see how it fares as i continue reading.

which i shall go off to do because, y'know, blizzard = free reading time.  have a good week, all!  and, fellow new yorkers (and bostonians and everyone in the beautiful spaces between), stay home, stay safe, and dig into those TBR piles!

hello monday! (150119)

i've been thinking about a posting schedule, about wanting to write things on a regular basis, maybe nothing "official" or themed but more casual and spur of the moment.  part of it is so i write more consistently, and another part is so i can write about books (or maybe even articles) i'm reading in the moment because the truth is that i start a lot more books than i finish (not because i start and drop books but because i have 4-5 books going at any given moment).  i thought about maybe a mid-week post on wednesday or an end-of-the-week post on friday, but i seem to have landed on a beginning-of-the-week post on monday, so here we go!  hello monday!


finished kazuo ishiguro's the buried giant (knopf, march 2015) and katie coyle's vivan apple at the end of the world (houghton mifflin harcourt, january 2015) last week, and they were two very different reads.  the buried giant (which i have been wanting to get my hands on since it was announced last may) was a surprise, not at all what i expected it to be, and i'm not quite sure how i feel about that yet.  vivian apple was a fun, breezy, but predictable read, and vivian's voice was funny and warm and earnest, and my favorite thing about it was her friendship with harp.  (we need more awesome female friendships depicted in the arts/media.)  all in all, it was a good reading week with lots of chess pie in different flavors -- started off with lemon chess on monday then had a chocolate chess on wednesday and a grapefruit chess on friday ... but then i broke the thread by getting salted caramel apple on saturday ...

longer, more in-depth reviews will come at the end of the month!  (started a dedicated book blog and, nope, still not committed to writing full, individual reviews of every book i read.  sorry.)  (not really.)  (but i will give the buried giant its own treatment because it's ishiguro.)

and now i plot ways to get my hands on purity ... september is a loooooong ways away ...


currently reading alex ross' the rest is noise (FSG, 2007) because one of my smaller reading goals for 2015 is to read more about music.  specifically classical music because it's one of my loves -- i grew up with it, was classically trained, but didn't learn that much about the history or cultural backdrop of music, so i'd like to learn more about music in the world.  thus far, the rest is noise has been a great read -- it's been fun to learn how wagner, mahler, strauss, debussy, stravinsky, ravel, etcetera are all connected, and, next, i'll be looking for titles that go into classical-/romantic-era composers because i've a giant soft spot for them!

here's to a new week!  have a good week, all!